“it’s because she’s deaf”: Being rejected from accessing psychiatric services due to deafness

Please read the below especially if you’re someone who has  had problems  accessing mental health services due to another  disability or knows someone who does. And if you’re someone as passionate as I am about finding long term solutions to  what truly is a crisis. And in the short term doing everything we can to find people, like  my friend, the  care they deserve.

Update: Sadly the temporary solution of moving her to a   deaf centered   mental illness group home did not work due to their inability to address her physical health concerns. She was re-hospitalized and the decission was made to send  her to the deaf/hoh unit at the state hospital. I’m hoping this isn’t the end of this intelligent,  loving, and vibrant woman’s life in the outside world. This should  not have happened!

 

 

My friend has been hospitalized at    an inpatient  psychiatric facility since the  beginning of this month. She was discharged from her former facility. I asked the clinical director there why  over at  least a dozen    facilities in the area would not take her. Would not even come interview her at the hospital to see  about her  needs. I thought it was a combination of her having a medical condition in  addition to psychiatric illness. But he said what I was afraid deep down I’d hear,”It’s because she’s deaf.”
Right away I said well that shouldn’t be a problem. There are solutions to this. He went on to say that actually in IL there are a lot of things going on that work at odds with each other and with people getting what they need.
First of all the health department could come into  any facility that has someone with additional disabilities to mental illness. And  they could comde in and see that the facility wasn’t up to standards for a facility that works with whatever  disability.  The staff could say they have developed solutions  to  whatever additional needs the person might have.   The person could say one hundred percent  they’re happy. Well  the facility would then still get a violation against them for not being disability compliant or whatever.
On the other hand, there’s nothing saying by law you need to have these accomidations in place. For example,  these facilities by law don’t need to have live interpreters. So this way a facility could say oh we don’t have any. And no one could fault them for that. They could fault them for taking the person anyway and making their own solutions even if the person is happy! It’s an ass backwards twisted system.
And there doesn’t seem to be a third party here. A group of people to really educate all these places about how you can work with disabilities and mental illness and it really won’t be expensive or unworkable. These people could establish what’s needed at least an initial foundation so that the person and facility have some common ground. Likewise they could talk with these health department officials and say that in the absence of being able to have everything technically up to    official standards people have to make their own home made solutions. If it works for everyone why punish them. The people who should get warnings or whatever are the places that will reject someone without even meeting them without even considering it for more than a few minutes. Knowing full well that person has nowhere to go.
I love the clinical director of her former  facility. Just  because   she isn’t  coming back doesn’t mean he’s turning his back on her. He is trying as hard as anyone. This is clearly a systemic problem and likely something that all people with disabilities and mental illness face.
The only solution I see is some kind of as I said mediating party that can both educate places around how accomidations can be done as well as calm the health department down. Without this you have these two opposing sides and no middle ground and just a confusing mess. And really it’s just leaving these places wide open to say oh well we don’t have to provide this so that’s it. We don’t have to provide accomidations, and if we try but it’s not up to par we could get violated.
That this could override looking at a person who clearly needs these services and pushing them away is absolutely heartbreaking and infuriating.
I asked about a task force  in IL  for the deaf with mental illness. as I mentioned above but there appears to be none.

I wonder about other states and their policies around this. I plan to explore more. Please share this with friends, family, co-workers, anyone in the fields of  human  services,  disability rights, and mental health. Feel free to contact me  personally at: nelsonsam68@gmail.com

Advertisements

One thought on ““it’s because she’s deaf”: Being rejected from accessing psychiatric services due to deafness

  1. this is so unfair to kat. she deserves a home. disability or not she needs to have somewhere to go. the fact that all these facilities are turning her down is not right. I hope with all my heart that between you and others like Jonathon and joel that something can be figured out. xxx

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s